Opposition leader Fayyaz Ismail on Thursday criticised the constitutional amendment passed by Parliament that imposes stricter anti-defection measures on parliamentarians, calling for a more democratic process to address party defections.
Speaking at a press conference held at the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) headquarters, Ismail acknowledged the importance of anti-defection measures in maintaining democratic stability but argued that the current approach undermines the rights of parliamentarians and voters.
“I believe there should be a due process,” Ismail said. “A member should lose his seat under certain circumstances, but they should have the opportunity to appeal or go to the people for a recall vote.”
Ismail noted that under the previous MDP government, anti-defection laws were introduced following extensive consultation to ensure members’ rights were protected. “There will be no anti-defection law as this government did under the MDP government,” he said, while reiterating his belief in the need for mechanisms to address party defections.
Context of Controversial Amendment
The constitutional amendment, ratified by President Muizzu on Wednesday just hours after parliamentary approval, has sparked significant debate. Among other changes, the amendment enforces the immediate loss of parliamentary seats for MPs who defect or are expelled by their parties.
The rushed process of passing the amendment has drawn criticism from opposition parties and political analysts, who warn that the changes could concentrate excessive power in the presidency and erode democratic norms.
MPs from the MDP and independent MP Abdul Rahman of Addu Meedhoo were the only members to vote against the legislation, citing concerns over its hasty passage and broader implications for parliamentary independence.